I think they are extremely well done. The color palettes she has used appear to be very "right" for the time periods. The only one that really struck me as "wrong" was the Civil War one. (Not sure what that says about me).
I'm curious as to the copyright implications of colorizations like this. If a publication opted for her color version of Hitchcock (for example) over using the traditional B&W would they be able to license it from her? Does she need permission from the original copyright holder to do this and be exempt from copyright claims herself? I'm not that up on copyright issues across borders. The fact that she is from Sweden might give her some sort of immunity...? Just wondering out loud here... I think her choice of images to colorize are sometimes a bit bizarre. I can't imagine sitting there and working on the one of the monk self-immolation for hours and hours, for example. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
