On 30 January 2012 13:41, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Dumb. >
Agreed. 32 film cameras, 17 digital cameras and 1 instant camera doesn't seem such a bad balance on the face of it, but the devil is in the detail. The digital representation seems intended to keep the big advertisers happy, there's a lot of C & N content that's pretty repetitious, but only two digital cameras ~weren't~ DSLRs or MILCs/EVILs. That as good as says that this list is meant to appeal firstly to camera enthusiasts. All I can say about the film cameras is Ermanox, Speed Graphic and Graflex, where are they? The Ermanox made available light handheld photography possible. The absence of Speed Graphic and Graflex says that decades of press photography is irrelevent in the judges eyes. And if only one Polaroid why not the first model? regards, Anthony "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight" (Anon) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
