On 2/4/2012 9:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 2/4/2012 7:02 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 2/4/2012 8:29 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
No, I didn't. This guy Zack Arias did:
http://zackarias.com/for-photographers/gear-gadgets/why-i-moved-to-medium-format-phase-one-iq140-review/
I do *not* need a 645. I do *not* need a 645. I do *not* need a 645.
Nope. -T
Man. This kind of stuff just depresses the hell out of me.
That's nothing. I was looking at photos from the dance last night and
was bummed at how rough, out of focus etc. so many of them were. I
can just imagine if I were to drop $30,000 on a kit like that, spend a
day taking photos, then look at them and be smacked upside the face
with incontrovertible proof of how crappy a photographer I am.
That's a good way to look at it, I suppose. Though, I can't help
succumbing to the self-loathing Irish in me and start thinking, "Why the
hell am I even doing this? I'll never have a 'real' camera like that!"
If I didn't enjoy it so much, I'd just chuck it all on a fire and save
myself a great deal of future temptation and expense.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
