As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid-to-late '90's I was a co-chair of 
a NATO research committee. We put together a Workshop (the presentations from 
which eventually became a book; and thus is world peace achieved). My Canadian 
colleagues in the group organized and hosted the workshop at Canada's 
counterpart to West Point in Kingston Ontario. So I went early, hung around New 
York's Finger Lakes district visiting relatives, then drove my rental car to 
Kingston via I-81 north, then the Macdonald-Cartier Freeway back southwest. A 
nice trip expect for the border crossing into Canada. "Why are you here?" the 
boarder guard queries. "To attend a NATO Workshop at the Royal Military Academy 
in Kingston" I replies. I fully expected a "Welcome, glad to have you here!" 
Instead I got a half-hour interrogation, careful scrutiny of my official U.S. 
Army travel orders, my official invite to the workshop on official Canadian 
Government stationary, my passport, my I.D card, etc. I don't know if it was 
because I wasn't wearing a suit, if it was the beard, if it was my coming in 
from upper NY even though I was based in Kansas . . . Maybe he was having a bad 
day. But my colleague who flew directly from KC via Toronto had a similar 
experience in Toronto, and he is cleancut and appears to be much more 
trustworthy. 

stan

On Feb 19, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> It does work both ways. Both countries are protective of their job base. When 
> I worked for Young & Rubicam and again when working for BBDO, I sometimes 
> collaborated with Toronto offices on creative projects. I often had trouble 
> crossing the border in Windsor. I had to say I was going to the Toronto 
> office for a meeting and sign documents saying that I wouldn't do any work. 
> Flying in  it was even worse at the Toronto airport, where long 
> interrogations and detailed body and luggage searches were common. If I had 
> creative material to bring with for discussion, I had to ship it.
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:51 PM, steve harley wrote:
> 
>> on 2012-02-18 14:36 P. J. Alling wrote
>>> I think this says it in a nutshell, (I'll paraphrase since I didn't bother 
>>> to
>>> copy and past). " you wouldn't want a Canadian stealing an American job 
>>> from a
>>> Mexican..."
>> 
>> i believe it works both ways — i had a memorable experience receiving a 
>> similar sentiment from Canada; traveling from Maine into Quebec in 1981, i 
>> hitchhiked up 201, got a ride with a Canadian man and turned his routine 
>> border crossing into a 90-minute interrogation & search ... i was barefoot 
>> and had only a student ID; i was told $400 in traveler's checks wasn't 
>> enough for my planned 21 day crossing to Vancouver, and Canada didn't want 
>> another homeless youth on its streets ... but i stuck to my story and 
>> somehow i was eventually let through; i am ever grateful to my ride — he 
>> stuck around and put up with a few indignities himself, and finally dropped 
>> me in Quebec City that night
>> 
>> (i boarded a ferry to leave Victoria more or less on schedule; have since 
>> entered Canada many times without trouble)
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to