That is a really tough subject. The large print might be necessary to
make it work.
If anyone has any hints on how to shoot trees in the woods so they come
out as a picture of something rather than just an abstract mass of
branches, I'm very interested. It's a subject that I've never been able
to do much with.
On 2/25/2012 7:00 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Jack,
I think Paul is right about a large print.
The web image just doesn't have necessary pop.
I can see what it must be, but need it BIGGER. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Paul Stenquist<[email protected]> wrote:
Intriguing. But with so much detail it will probably work better as a large
print rather than a web image. A tighter crop and larger image area would
probably help here. I do like the light on the blossoms and the way they
explode out of the forest. I just think the way it's displayed isn't doing it
justice.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Another of those previously posted as, "Along the River."
Comments invited.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=631
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Larry Colen [email protected] (from dos4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
