> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Tom C > Sent: 14 March 2012 21:12 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: OT - Online critics > > > > > If we don't see what all the fuss is about then rather than > dismissing > > it as pretentious nonsense, as so many os us do, perhaps we should be > > a little more humble and consider that maybe we don't know how to > look > > at a picture, whether it's by Picasso, HCB, Ansel Adams or Thomas > > Kinkade, and perhaps we should be doing something to find out why the > picture is considered great. > > > > We never know, it might even improve we's own picture-making. > > > > I mean taking. > > > > B > > Now see there YOU go insulting Ansel, Bob. I believe he would say one > MAKES not takes a picture. >
How could you _possibly_ think it an insult when I mention him in the same breath as Thomas Kinkade?! B > I agree half-way with you. The theoretical image COULD be pure schmuck > and 'the many' were duped into following the masses because of the > stature of the photographer. > > Tom C. Maybe, but how does the photographer get his stature in the first place, if all he produces is pure schmuck? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
