Time for a shootout?

I think you should have a Pentax vs. whatever it is you shoot, Nikon?, with
somebody on the list.  That somebody won't be me. Maybe someone you've
pissed off?  I bet you both get great pics.  Chances are the Pentax system
will be just as good if not better than your Nikon system.  PZ1p + FA 80-200
f2.8 or FA 28-200 f3.5/5.6 vs Nikon F5 + AF 80-200 f2.8 or AF-S 80-200 f2.8
or 28-200 Nikon? Car race, bike race?

:) Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: AF speed (was: Silly Photo.net thread)


> The issue is Depth Of Field. Shooting wide open with long lenses gives a
very
> shallow DOF. If the whole AF system (lens speed/electronics/motor, etc.)
> doesn't work fast enough, the subject can past through the range of
apperent
> sharpness before the shutter fires. Before AF lenses were stopped down for
> "focus margin" for shots like this. Lens performance aside, it's harder to
get
> a fast moving subject in focus at f2.8 than f11.
>
>
> --- Rob Brigham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I dont get this question.  The focussing aperture was F/2.8, or possibly
> > F/4 with the teleconvertor.  Since the shutter doesnt fire unless the
> > subject is in focus, the shooting aperture is pretty much irrelevant.
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to