I wrote:
>One of the more interesting technique are the arguments >against eg. brand y, and even if this has nothing to do with the consensus >brands, it used anyway as an argument as why you should buy those brands. >These argument have almost never any contextual basis, like what the >photographer prefers or what needs he/she has. One example of this is that a rank amateur considering a Pentax MZ-5n should buy a Nikon or a Canon because you can't rent a Pentax 600/4 in Florida. It is of course of no consequence to this rational argument that 99,99% of the worlds population have never been to Florida or that 99,99% of Pentax users in Florida never considers renting a 600/4. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
