<[email protected]> wrote: >I guess we'll just have to disagree. >I don't see how the judges could have been certain that the image was staged >when they viewed it. You couldn't expect them to have known about that >particular scene. It could have been possible that the scene was captured >remotely in the wild and the photographer did have a bogus story about all >the time spend tracking wolves.
I agree. Unlike Photoshop cheating, there's simply no way for a contest judge to determine when this kind of cheating has been done. Even good Photoshop work would be almost impossible to detect on a routine basis. The judges did all that was humanly possible on first evaluation and responded ethically when the cheating was pointed out. One can't expect any more than that. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
