The M50/1.7 is not noticeably bigger than the M50/2.0 I'd go with the former.
At 09:03 AM 3/11/2002 -0800, you wrote: >And an MX with a K35/3.5 or an M50/2.0 *is* pretty much a pocket-sized >kit <g>. > >Mark Roberts wrote: > > > An MX with a 43/1.9 is a gerat almost-pocket-sized kit. > >-- >Shel Belinkoff >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ >http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
