1816 is a simply wonderful shot! Well done indeed. 1824 might look better if you cropped out most of the OOF stuff on the bottom and left side. I like the head and the arc of the neck.
Dan Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > But crappy pics. Couldn't get close enough for the 60-250, but couldn't pas > up this great blue heron that was holding court at the opening of a culvert > where the Rouge River runs under a street near my house. Lots of shrubbery in > the way, but I found some holes. 1816 is about 40% of frame, 1824 is about > 20% of frame. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15629832&size=lg > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15629833&size=lg > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
