Heh. I can't win: when I respond at great length to a question, it's suggested I could have answered in two sentences. When I answer in two sentences ... well now I'm going to have to respond at length.
Usually we post an opinion, something newsworthy, a picture, or a pointer to somebody else's opinion, news or picture. This seemed to lack on all counts. It's a list of acceptance criteria all of which are appropriate to a journal such as NatGeo. That NatGeo accepts user shots isn't news. That they have acceptance criteria isn't news. So I went, "meh". But Tim just pointed out that NatGeo okays HDR. So *that's* news ... On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/06/2012 12:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> >> To what end? If I were submitting shots to NatGeo then maybe, but I'm >> not so I see nothing worth reading there. >> > > New PDML Rule: > No more submitting anything to the list without vetting it past Bruce first. > > -- > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
