On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for your comments. I had uploaded my new version and just >> ordered my proof copy two minutes ago: >> http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/3312094 >> >> . . . > >> So, now, every blurb book I've done, I've done with different software. The >> first one with the blurb software, which I downloaded. The second with >> InDesign, the third with Lightroom. Lightroom has some annoying >> limitations, but it's a lot easier to use, and learn, than InDesign, and >> still a lot more flexible than the blurb software. It also has the >> advantage of processing the photos directly into the book, rather than >> processing them into an intermediate stage. >> > > In what respect(s) is LR more flexible than Blurb?
It's been about a year and a half since I did the book using the blurb software, but as I remember, the downloadable blurb software was a lot more limited in the page formats. It is entirely possible that: A) I didn't spend enough time to learn how to wring everything out of the blurb software B) My memory is broken C) They have added more functionality to the blurb software. D) All of the above -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
