That plastic look is something that needs to be reworked.  It's a
combination of noise reduction and slightly out of focus.   I don't
like it either. gs
George Sinos
--------------------
[email protected]
www.georgesphotos.net
plus.georgesinos.com


On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:50 AM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> You're right, the expressions make it.
>
> Wonderful.
>
> He looks like maybe he's overprocessed (or did it come from the camera like 
> that?) - almost plasticky looking. I find that a bit distracting.
>
> Still, a wonderful moment captured. A photo well worth keeping and treasuring.
>
> Cheers,
> frank
>
> "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- 
> Christopher Hitchens
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: George Sinos <[email protected]>
> Sent: June 15, 2012 6/15/12
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: PESO - PAD - Anniversary - Print-a-Day-16
>
> This is number 16 in the series "Print-a-Day for 30 Days."
>
> <http://georges.posterous.com/anniversary-print-a-day-16>
>
> This is my cousin and her husband on their 24th wedding anniversary.
> They're watching a video of their family history that was put
> together, as a surprise, by their daughters.
>
> This is, technically, a pretty bad photo.  We were sitting in a
> slightly darkened room, there is a big bright spot on the window
> shades, the camera sensitivity setting went way too high and the
> original photo is full of noise.  It's even slightly out of focus.  I
> was close to tossing it.
>
> I'd rather the photo was technically better, but the expressions are
> just too good.  This image captures the feeling of that moment and
> will always be one of my favorites.
>
> Lightroom helped save the photo.  The highlights were subdued and the
> shadows were increased.  Noise reduction was applied with a pretty
> heavy hand.  That smooths the skin a little more than I'd like. (I'm
> sure my cousin won't complain.)  A vignette helps to darken the window
> light.  Her hair and glasses were made a bit sharper with the
> adjustment brush.
>
> And what do you know, when you look at the final 8x10 print from a
> normal viewing distance, it turns out to be a pretty good photo.  Not
> great, but it'll do.
>
> gs
>
> George Sinos
> --------------------
> [email protected]
> www.georgesphotos.net
> plus.georgesinos.com
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to