On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:36:09AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > Last night, I was thinking about how one performance limitation that I run up > against the most often is write speed to the storage. My first idea was a > camera grip that had a slot for a laptop SSD drive. My second thought was > that a "compact SSD" would be better. Even if storage were limited on the > initial generations of the platform, even 128GB at SATA, or better yet STA-3 > speeds, would be so much better than writing to SD cards. We're talking up > to 1500-3000 MBPS rather than 30-45: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_device_bit_rates
1) That wouldn't help. The I/O subsystem in the camera can't handle that sort of data rate. It's no good putting in a fast device if you can't feed data to it fast enough. 2) Physically attached storage? How 20th-century. Think wireless. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
