Lovely. They have an element of the abstract but a clear subject. I understand her point about not using PS. For some photographer, the discipline of a particular procedure grounds their work in some ways and lets their imagination work in other ways.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Darren Addy > > >> http://1x.com/photo/19074 >> >> Ursula I Abresch explains her technique (for the image linked above, >> if not many others)... >> >> "No. It is making two images in camera (that is, if you have a camera >> that allows you to do so). You set the camera to double (or more >> exposures if you wish), then make the two images and they're combined >> in camera into one file. You could also do it in PS, however, I prefer >> the more "natural" results you get doing it in camera. PS is a bit too >> controlled an environment for my taste, in general. Fernand calls it >> the defocusing technique. I started doing this well before coming to >> 1X and meeting Fernand, based on work by Freeman Patterson. I believe >> there are probably a number of names for this technique." >> >> That blows me away even more, that she is doing it in camera. > > > Sounds like Tony Sweet. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
