If you can afford it, the 24-90 is the way to go. The Pop Photo test is very favourable. If you want an affordable lens with excellent quality, the 4/28-70 is it. I have never seen a 28-105 that has tested well in the long end. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Peter Smekal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 14. maaliskuuta 2002 8:11 Aihe: 28-70 vs 24-90 vs 28-105 >I'm thinking about buying a good and not too expensive "normal range" zoom >lense to use on my Z1-p. There is the SMC-FA 28-70 mm/4,0 AL which I have >seen. It seems to be quite good and not too pricy. There are also two newer >lenses, both with more tele-range: >1) SMC-FA 24-90mm f/3.5-4.5 AL [IF] and >2) SMC-FA 28-105/3,2-4,5 AL [IF] >At leastv here in Sweden the 24-90 is more expensive than the other two >lenses. Is it worth the extra money? >What is your opinion (humble of course) of these lenses? Any >recommendations? Have you seen any test results for the new lenses? > >Peter Smekal >Uppsala, Sweden >[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
