I like the soft focus one, (very much) as well.

The comment about the "blur being too much" reminds me how each of us
has different views of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable
(what we consider "photography" as opposed to something else). For
instance, *I* am biased against the non-photorealistic use of HDR (in
fact, I think the term has been irreversibly corrupted by most of what
is now called "HDR"). However, I recognize that some people actually
like that kind of stuff and will purposely produce it. The same is
true of people who only think of photography as properly expressed
only through "realism" or for documentary purposes.

Recently, I have been realizing that I am drawn *a lot* by
impressionism and subjective photographic imagery. (For example, there
is a whole new way of looking at the world when you open the door to
multiple-exposure photography. Those multiple exposures can be a
combination of in-focus and out-of-focus shots that can produce some
really beautiful, painterly effects in-camera.) I realize that my
hatred of "dialed to eleven" HDR is somewhat at odds with this
understanding about myself and my appreciation of the subjective and
impressionistic. I guess I will have to apply the words of Walt
Whitman: "Do I contradict myself? Very well, then, I contradict
myself. I am large, I contain multitudes."

I think that the old "soft-focus" lenses and diffusers are clearly a
step in that subjective direction. They may not be everyone's "cup 'o
tea", but in the end the only person our photography *needs* to please
is ourselves. Soft focus lenses are a tool, like any other. They can
give a variety of effects in different light and at different
apertures. We may not like all of the effects it produces, but enjoy
some of them (for certain applications) very much.

We may dip our toe in the water or find ourselves submerged in the
exploration of any one tool or technique. Some of us may avoid
limiting ourselves to any one style, tool or technique because we
crave variety. Others may enjoy a more systematic analysis of one tool
or subject before moving on to something else. Most of us are probably
a little of both at various times... or maybe that's just me.

A bit of a ramble... I'll stop while I'm behind.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to