Maybe the old Tokina RMC 17mm f/3.5. If you can find one it should be very cheap. I would prefer the DA18-55 II for the best price/performance.
Toine On 21 August 2012 00:56, Walt Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > . . . and give me your thoughts. > > Say you're going to be leaving for the Black Hills of South Dakota in a > little over a month and have an extremely limited budget. I'm quite > literally saving up the quarters from my tips (along with everything else > that I can) to finance it. But, you want to make sure that you get some > images worthy of the trip. > > I'll be taking all of my camera bodies with me -- K-x, K20D, K100D Super -- > and plan to use my Promaster 70-300 as a zoom, at least one of my 50mm > primes, and I'd like to have something wider for landscapes. I have a > Takumar 28/2.8, but it's really a pretty crappy lens compared to the others. > > What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the lowest > buck -- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the focal > length and IQ -- everything else is mere window dressing as far as I'm > concerned. I'm essentially looking for something very common and highly > regarded. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks! > > -- Walt > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
