That's most likely what'll happen. I was just hoping there might be a
glut of some great short lens out there that "everyone" has in their kit
just because they're so great and readily available.
-- Walt
On 8/20/2012 10:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Borrow something.
Walt Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
. . . and give me your thoughts.
Say you're going to be leaving for the Black Hills of South Dakota in a
little over a month and have an extremely limited budget. I'm quite
literally saving up the quarters from my tips (along with everything
else that I can) to finance it. But, you want to make sure that you get
some images worthy of the trip.
I'll be taking all of my camera bodies with me -- K-x, K20D, K100D
Super
-- and plan to use my Promaster 70-300 as a zoom, at least one of my
50mm primes, and I'd like to have something wider for landscapes. I
have
a Takumar 28/2.8, but it's really a pretty crappy lens compared to the
others.
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the
lowest buck -- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the
focal length and IQ -- everything else is mere window dressing as far
as
I'm concerned. I'm essentially looking for something very common and
highly regarded.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
