On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:

> One might think it tedious to go through video looking for stills (30
> of them per second) but, if there isn't already, there soon will be
> Lightroom-V sort of programs that do it for you. 10 seconds of video
> would be laid out in 300 thumbnails for you to zoom in on and do
> further post-processing. 10 minutes of video would give you 18000
> images to zoom through.

It would be tedious, for sure.  Even with a big beefy Mac Pro, the
process of going pic-to-pic on my K-5 DNGs is far, far from instant. I
shudder to think what the people with the 645s and big CaNikons go
through. The software/hardware combination which would make working
with this volume of this size of picture easy doesn’t exist, and isn’t
on the horizon, that I’m aware of. -T

>
> All of this sounds rather unpalatable to most of us, I'm sure. Just
> like many people are still enjoying film (and some young people
> discovering it for the first time, the same may be said for still
> photography). So it will be with still cameras. There will be a period
> where weddings are being photographed by people using video, while
> others hold on to still digital... just as there were film shooters
> overlapping with early adopters of DSLRs. Eventually, still
> photography will be dominated by people who are strobe lighting
> experts, since you can't duplicate the light output of a flash for
> anything resembling long duration video unless you can afford and
> master Hollywood lighting set-ups. (the length of the flash determines
> how many video frames you have to choose from... if it is less than a
> 30th of a sec. then you will only have 1 exposure on a 30 fps camera).
>
> In film, the director is considered the creative force. He leans on a
> director of photography and people to run the actual cameras. The sort
> of still images coming from video of the future puts all of those jobs
> in one person's hands (which those who are using their cameras for
> video are already transitioning into). The job is just going to get
> bigger and more sophisticated, and more widespread.
>
> The far-sighted camera manufacturers can already see this day coming,
> getting closer with each new revision of sensor, computing power,
> software and increased storage. That's why most are putting more and
> more emphasis on the video capabilities of their DSLRs. Some, like
> Sony and Canon are producing both video cameras and still cameras.
> Those that don't should probably be looking to acquire businesses (or
> be acquired by them) that have that expertise and manufacturing
> ability - because the future is going to involve a lot of
> cross-pollination between engineers on both sides of the hall.
>
> Those who fail to see the future and adapt quickly to it will be the
> Kodaks of tomorrow.
>
>
> --
> "The key to seeing the world's soul, and in the process wakening one's
> own, is to get over the confusion
> by which we think that fact is real and imagination an illusion. It is
> the other way around."
>
>                           -Thomas Moore, "Original Self"
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to