On Sep 1, 2012, at 00:30 , David Mann wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've seen pictures like this done by a Russian photographer.
>>
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2196268/What-1906-San-Francisco-earthquake-happened-today-Photo-trickery-shows-hit-city.html
>
> Doesn't really do much for me.
>
> BTW why do some papers have to give both a title and a caption to their
> photos these days? For some reason it really annoys me.
Don't know about Lightroom or any other editor, but Aperture has both fields in
it's EXIF form. It almost begs one to do both, though I do not know what the
difference is between the two. Perhaps it is as found in APOD's daily imagery.
Title: - Astronomy Picture of the Day
2012 August 26
Caption: - The Cat's Eye Nebula
Image Credit: - J. P. Harrington (U. Maryland) & K. J. Borkowski (NCSU) HST,
NASA
Explanation: - Three thousand light-years away, a dying star throws off shells
of glowing gas. This image from the Hubble Space Telescope reveals theCat's Eye
Nebula to be one of the most complex planetary nebulae known. In fact, the
features seen in the Cat's Eye are so complex that astronomers suspect the
bright central object may actually be a binary star system. The term planetary
nebula, used to describe this general class of objects, is misleading. Although
these objects may appear round and planet-like in small telescopes, high
resolution images reveal them to be stars surrounded by cocoons of gas blown
off in the late stages of stellar evolution.
Found at http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120826.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
