Thanks for looking, Paul. You are right. I just noticed that I haven't been adding the lenses, as I should. I have edited this one to show it was taken with my DA 18-135.
You may have noticed that I screwed up badly in taking this image, but it came out fairly well, despite my wort efforts. <G> Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > Photo.net includes lens information if the photographer enters it. > > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:32 AM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Very nice and sharp. On a side note have you ever noticed that Photo.net >> details don't include any lens information, arguably more important >> information about how a photo was made than the camera body? >> >> On 10/1/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16494531 >>> >>> Dan Matyola >>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >>> >> >> >> -- >> Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a >> lengthly search. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
