Don't rule out the eye level electronic VF models.  EVFs are pretty
good these days and OVFs are pretty rare.

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Christine Aguila
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Steve, very helpful.  I've always been intrigued by this version and 
> the X100.  I need to check it out at a camera store.  I shall put that on the 
> TO DO list.  Good to know about the optical VF and the lens quality on the 
> X10.  If I were to invest in a *serious compact, * I'd want an excellent 
> optical viewfinder because I'm steadier and more comfortable when the camera 
> is left-of-nose rather than center-of-nose--when doing surface photography 
> that is; when I'm splashing around in water with the Optio WG II, 
> center-of-nose is just fine :-).
>
> Big thanks, Steve.  Cheers, Christine
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Since Christine asked, here are a few words about the X10.  Nicely
>> built with a decent control layout.  I would have put some things in
>> different places, but it's easy to get used to it.  It's more
>> naturally used as an LCD-VF camera.  The optical VF is not great and
>> only gives about 80% coverage, but it's a godsend in the bright
>> daylight conditions when the LCD is hard to use.  No information in
>> the OVF; it's a simple (zooming) sighting tool although you can pick
>> up the AF confirm beep easily enough.  The lens is beautiful piece of
>> optics: 28-112, f2-2.8 sharp and well designed for a digital sensor.
>> Of course, the smaller 2/3 sensor makes the compact size of such a
>> lens possible.  AF is OK but this is not a football camera.  The new
>> "orb-free" sensor is very, very nice, although in all ways inferior to
>> having a top end end APS-C sensor like the K5. This is not a
>> criticism, just some perspective since so many folks on the PDML will
>> have a K5 IQ as a standard.  It gives nice detail at 12 MP and can
>> switch to a 6 MP mode that will oversample the pixels to compensate
>> for low light and DR issues.
>>
>> A real question is size.  It's small and nice in the hand but at best
>> coat-pockeatble.  In that sense, it gets real competition from mu43
>> cameras like the Olympus E-PM1/2 with a sensor twice as large.  (I
>> have an E-PM1 I picked up for $180;  I love refurbished stuff.)  The
>> newer 16 mp mu43 sensors in the E-PM2 seriously competes with the
>> entry level APS-C DSLRs in terms of IQ.  An equivalent zoom would be
>> huge on the Oly, but with the smaller primes it's the same size as the
>> x-10.  Of course, there are lots of compacts out there if you want a
>> snap shooter (XZ-1, LX-7) and the RX100 gives great IQ albeit with
>> reportedly stone-age handling.  Of course, the Q is out there really
>> cheap right now with that tiny body and sensor.  Nice in decent light.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Derby Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Everything Bob says about the X100, I'd confirm. It certainly is a quirky
>>> machine. I'd also add, if you were buying second hand, make sure it is one
>>> of the later versions (serial number starting with "2").
>>>
>>> I bought one of the early ones. Fine for a few months, then I got the
>>> dreaded sticky aperture problem (the leaf shutter not stopping down when
>>> shooting lower that full open). Luckily I had my fellow ebayer's purchase
>>> receipt, so in it went to Fuji Australia
>>>
>>> It came back with the lens assembly replaced, but the sensor had gone wonky
>>> - every shot had a magenta cast. The RAW files are such that it could be
>>> corrected in LR, but life's too short. So back for a second time.
>>>
>>> It came back with the sensor adjusted, but then the OVF was completely
>>> psycho - looked like a Peter Fonda movie. After some calls, they took it
>>> back again, and I got a brand new, in the box, unit in return. Been happy
>>> ever since.
>>>
>>> Why perservere? The sensor and lens combination are amazing. So much dynamic
>>> range and beautiful high ISO. One of the nice features is the auto-DR. In
>>> bright light, it will select a high ISO and deliberately underexpose to keep
>>> the highlights. The high ISO brings up the shadows, and to no real detriment
>>> to noise. Freaked me out the first time I used it, but the results speak for
>>> themselves.
>>>
>>> Other things I love about it...
>>>
>>> * Silent
>>> * Live histogram, even with the optical viewfinder
>>> * Aperture, shutter speed and exposure comp right where they should be. But
>>> Bob is right, the dials, especially the exposure comp are a bit easy to
>>> nudge accidentally. I have to say, the new X100 has the dial a little
>>> tighter. I still check it once in a while.
>>> * Fantastic with the wide-angle converter (making it an equivalent 28mm
>>> fov).
>>>
>>> If I had to grab one camera if someone gave me 5 min to pack for a world
>>> trip, that's the one I'd take.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm still intrigued by this camera, because to my eye, it fits well with
>>>> much of what I do and would make a good walking around camera.
>>>>
>>>> Bob W? Cotty? Anyone else? I've read that it's frustrating. Is it more
>>>> trouble than its worth?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to