645D? And isn't in camera stabilization a Pentax patent? Bob S. On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote: > That post in steves-digicams.com that I linked to earlier noted that: > "SR with adapted lenses -- This now works like the DSLRs, but the > setting of the FL is different. I can enter any FL between 0 and > 9999.9" > > I wonder if this was necessary because of the higher precision needed > for SR in the smaller sensor > and > if this means that future firmware updates might modify SR in the big > cameras to modify things the same way. > > By the way (changing the subject), is there anybody that does in-body > SR on a full frame sensor other than Sony? Just wondering if that is > what is mucking up the development issues for Pentax (that would not > have been an issue for most of the other players). Sony has it in > their new A99, but I wonder if Pentax has to work around patent issues > (or bite the bullet and license it, if possible). > > From Sony A99 specs: > "Image Stabilization : SteadyShot INSIDE™ in-body image stabilization. > Compensation effect: Equivalent to approx. 2.5 to 4.5 steps in shutter > speeds *Varies according to shooting conditions and lens used. Type: > For still images: Image Sensor-Shift mechanism, For movies: Electronic > " > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
