So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during an exposure, and at the same time, moving the sensor to introduce AA?
What does 'mechanical AA do that the optical method doesn't do? What would be the advantage of it? On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > Pentaxforums posted a quick comparison between the K-5 and the K-5IIs > http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-5-iis-vs-k-5-sample-photos.html > > Which reminded me of something I've been wondering about. Rather than doing > anti-aliasing optically, wouldn't it be possible to have a special setting > that would move the sensor a pixel diagonally, or possibly in a one pixel > diameter circle over the course of the exposure? > Also, does the nyquist rate depend on the size of the RGB sets? Or just on > the individual sensor sites? I'd think that it would be possible to increase > the nyquist rate by analyzing the data from each sensor site. > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
