You're right Stig, but for me what AF parameters he did measure is useful to know. I find SDM lens focussing to be pretty good in bright light already, even on the K20D. So if low-light focus speed was made a lot better -- and it sounds like it was -- then that puts the K-5IIs on my wish-list. That and the improved resolution are a strong motivation for me.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:44 AM, SV Hovland <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam at Pentaxforums is only concerned about focus speed. And that is the > only property he tested. So we really don't know how much better autofocus is > in normal light. Someone has to test focus tracking (AF-C), focus accuracy, > focus repeatability and so on. > > Stig Vidar Hovland > > ________________________________________ > Fra: PDML [[email protected]] på vegne av Bruce Walker > [[email protected]] > Sendt: 29. oktober 2012 19:39 > To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List > Emne: K-5IIs review and comparison to K-5 > > From our friends at Pentax Forums. :-) > > http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-5-ii-iis/introduction.html > > Some highlights: > AF much better in low light, unimproved in normal light. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
