On 1 November 2012 05:51, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lets look at the K-5. When it comes to low light work, it is > absofuckinglutely amazing. In some ways it is close to on par with a D700. > The D800 increases the resolution over the D700, but for low light it's not a > lot better. The Canon 5d3 is pretty amazing in low light, but either of > those cameras cost two, nearly three times what a K-5 does. What was the > K-5s one weakness in low light? Focus. And they seem to have addressed that > issue.
Yeah I love the K5's IQ in low light, it's superb, so long as the subject stays pretty still (that said I am not using the green AF strobe of death either, far too distracting to my targets) -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
