> From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu <[email protected]> > Let's see... > - 1.5 GHz dual core processor needed, to avoid lag in menus and simple > applications > - battery will last ~2 hours with intensive use > - applications are written in Java, i.e. slow so don't even think > about image processing > - an useless touch-based interface replacing hardware controls > But you'll get Facebook integration, several browsers to chose from > and Angry Birds. You could even make phone calls, if an application > like Skype is installed - as I was told at Photokina, when looking at > the Samsung Galaxy Camera ;) > > Best regards, > Alex Sarbu
Actually I thought the Samsung Galaxy Camera didn't look too bad. I don't want one, I wish it saved RAW's, and I know it's not a 'serious' camera. My son's Panasonic whatever that I got him 5 years ago has stopped displaying the image about to be captured on the LCD screen. This could be a suitable replacement. The Galaxy has the same or better zoom ability and a higher resolution. For a P&S it might be OK and extremely convenient when it comes to emailing or posting images. The real disappointment is that it DOESN'T have a true phone option. It would likely be a much better camera-phone than most phone-cameras. I could replace his two devices with one. Tom C.. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
