Guess I unintentionally made my funk sound more serious than I intended. My lengthy experience has been completely contrary to what one might assume from these nefarious test results. Just thought there might be some founded negative history of these particular testers.
Comments appreciated, Igor. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:46 PM Subject: Re: DXOMark Pentax Lens Tests Jack, Maybe experience-based (!) personal opinions of many people about various Pentax lenses would help you: http://stans-photography.info/ . While, naturally, it might be skewed and not objective, what ultimately matters is your own experience with the lenses. For the lenses that you already have, - don't read reviews, - if you are happy with them, - just enjoy. For the lenses that you don't have, - you can save money if you don't buy them. Use the money to fund experiences (travel?) where you can use your existing lenses. ;-) Cheers, Igor PS You can also look at http://plg.komkon.org/ at links therein. Those are somewhat dated, but contain a lot of interesting test results if that's what you are interested in. On Nov 20, 2012, at 16:04 , Jack Davis <jdavisf8 at yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm sort of in a funk after reading DXO's Pentax lens test results. > Even allowing for some older MP and camera technology, as a test group > they demonstrate pitiful performance. > > I dare anyone to make me feel better? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
