> From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu <[email protected]>

> The declaration about wanting to double the sales in 2013 appeared in
> a Japanese interview, as did the full frame talk. The roadmaps are
> available on Pentax Japan's website, and being lens roadmaps they
> don't include any camera. Every little piece of information available
> shows they are not planning to "miss the boat"; I'm sure that will be
> confirmed next year.

Respectfully, practically every company would want to see sales double
next year. I'd like to find I had a long lost uncle who left me heir
to his multi-million dollar estate. What have they done at the end of
this year so that we might reasonably expect those declarations to
come to fruition next year?

A roadmap, much like one used when driving a vehicle shows where you
can go, possibly wish to go, but doesn't mean you've gone there.

I would agree they're not planning to miss the boat.

> I'm sure that, in Japan, the market for a Pentax FF would be much
> smaller (talking about units here) than for the Q. That's not an
> argument against the FF, though.

Is that Pentax's largest market, though, Japan? I'm asking because
Pentax looks like they want to compete on the global stage. Understood
on FF.

>>
>>> Which Pentax was unable to deliver (a full frame system, I presume)?
>>> The old Pentax Corporation, bought out by Hoya? Pentax, as a Hoya
>>> division? Or the 14 months old Pentax Ricoh?
>>

> But how could the actual Pentax Ricoh be blamed because Hoya Pentax
> didn't had the funds to make a full frame product line? Or because
> Pentax Corporation's main shareholder was Sparx, who wanted to sell?
> Or for whatever caused Samsung's unwillingness to do more?
> I'll say again: the current Pentax Ricoh is a 14 months newborn; there
> simply wasn't enough time for them to "deliver".

I'm not assessing blame, I'm looking at 'as-is' state. Much like you
can't blame Germans today for the holocaust or Americans born well
after WWII for nuking Japan, the effects of those actions persist. I
know those are exaggerated comparisons, but you get the point. The
entity known as Pentax Ricoh was not in the position to develop a 24
MP APS-C body or a FF body even though sensors are available for use.

>>
>> Even at this date, it's hard to find a Pentax on display in any major
>> retail outlet (i.e. Big Boxes, warehouse clubs, or department stores)
>> in the US, or advertising of any kind. Driving through Hartford, CT
>> last week I saw a huge billboard advertising the Canon T4i.
> The situation in US seems particularly bad, I'll give you that.

I've probably beat this around as much as I care to. :)

If Pentax does come out with some high demand products it would be
good for both Pentax and its customers and I'd applaud them.

Tom C.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to