On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote:

>> From: William Robb <[email protected]>
>> 
>> On 10/12/2012 3:34 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
>> 
>>> Maybe I'm missing something, but since diffraction is actually
>>> affecting what's projected on the sensor, in other words its effect
>>> being the same regardless of the pixel count, why would the end result
>>> be worse for a higher resolution sensor?
>>> Isn't that only because we're now used to pixel peeping, which means
>>> applying different magnification levels (and quite insane ones, too)?
>> 
>> I will have to bow to the knowledge of pixel peepers and mathematicians.
>> I am but a simple photographer who neither pixel peeps nor can add past
>> nine with his shoes on.
>> 
>>> 
>>> By the way, IMO 24MP and higher resolutions (even in APS-C) are
>>> inevitable; Pentax will have to update their sensors anyway when Sony
>>> would phase out the older ones.
>>> 
>> More pixels!!!!
> 
> I never realized you were missing a finger Bill.
> 
> I look at it very simple-mindedly. With more pixels one is potentially
> able to capture more detail. If the lens is not up to the sensor
> performance, i.e, light is diffracted or spread across more pixels
> (not really capturing more detail), the fact that their ARE more
> pixels exposed to the image means one can either crop and retain
> resolution or enlarge to a greater degree before evident pixelation
> occurs.

But there's a tradeoff, as pixel density contributes to noise. The K-5 sensor 
is still one of the most highly rated in the camera biz. I wouldn't trade 
low-noise at high ISO for more detail. Perhaps others would, but the K-5 works 
well for me as is.

> 
> Tom C.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to