Serious suggestion, Larry (to follow). When you first started showing here I suggested off list that you edit your photos. You commented about it on list and everyone essentially jumped all over me (although you did not name me, thank you for that.)
Take a class, with a critical teacher, like an advanced photography class. >From live feedback from students AND teacher you should be able to get enough feedback to get a better feeling for what are your best/better photos. What compositional elements make up your better photos. You don't have to agree with all their assessments, but you will still get a feeling. HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-) In a message dated 1/8/2013 1:14:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > but you need to edit the set yourself. There's the rub, They all look to be of about equal quality to me, I tried to narrow it down to the best one or two of each type. I don't see what makes one better than the others. Which is why I so much appreciate more detailed critique. A few of the photos have people, or birds, doing something, which I think makes the photo more interesting, it's not just of a pretty place, but it's of something happening at a pretty place. That's why I posted 022 as the PESO, because I found it amusing to see all these other guys out there taking pretty much the same photo as each other, which was pretty much the same photo as 006 or 151. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
