I must admit I find the subject spooky. Always have. Too many sci-fi
movies about robots I guess.
The photography is stellar however!
[email protected] wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:42:35 -0500
From: Bruce Walker<[email protected]>
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List<[email protected]>
Subject: GESO Mannequins, when they're at home
Message-ID:
<CAJUU0CcNEc7FDOU_L8=HuBm_5Sa_yEtN=+5u0fv3nddw5su...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
[* Possibly NSFW, See below ... *]
You can blame Frank for this project.:-)
http://www.behance.net/gallery/Mannequins-when-theyre-at-home/6868595
or
http://goo.gl/P7nzw if the long one broke.
Back in September Frank posted a PESO of some broken mannequins at a
store in his neighborhood. I asked him the address as I'd been looking
for an inexpensive mannequin to use for lighting tests. Sure enough,
the store, "Then Again Vintage", had a small number of mannequins left
over from a sale, and I bought one. The clerk mentioned that they had
way more stuff at the main warehouse.
That turned out to be a significant understatement! As you'll see when
you look at the gallery.
All shots: K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 SDM, Tav, 1/60th, ISO ranges 200 - 3200.
Lightroom 4.3, Photoshop CS5.
All ambient light, handheld.
* I hate to need to mention this, but better safe than sorry. Many
images depict flesh coloured, undraped female mannequin torsos. If
displaying plastic boobies on your screen might be a concern, don't
scroll down from the initial image. Yes, the 1st image is 100% safe. *
Comments welcome, of course.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
