On 2/14/2013 1:56 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Walt wrote:
Here's another that was a bit noisier, so I softened it a bit to
give it a little glow:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/8473322049/
f/3.2, 1/60 sec., ISO 6400
(I'm really impressed with ISO 6400, BTW!)
One thing I appreciate about you posting these photos is that they're
definitely pushing me away from taking Larry's advice to bring the
50/1.4 on my trip. (I'm already bringing the 16-50/2.8 and 35/2.8
macro, and one of my goals is to minimize kit size. I'm not expecting
to take many low-light photos, and your photos are persuasive that 2.8
should handle the situations I might run into.)
Well, I'm glad I was able to at least provide some guidance. I stick
close f/2.8 because that's what I was told was the sweet spot for the
50/1.4 -- so, I wouldn't rule out taking it for that fact alone. Seems
to me you could get some great shots that way.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
