On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22 February 2013 10:58, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I shared that link 8 days ago in the "Last call for K-5" thread, but >> it elicited no comments, which surprised me, a bit. > > I saw the link when it was first posted, I think it's a somewhat > exaggerated result, I guess others thought so too.
I wish he had provided raw files for the tree scene, and preferably files from "twin" cameras (D800/D800E or K-5 II/IIs). In the early days of digital cameras, the demosaicing algorithms were prone to creating false detail(false color, maze artifacts, etc.) even in cameras with AA filters. They have improved considerably over the years. I suspect the algorithms may need another round of tweaking to behave better with non-AA cameras, and some may already do better than others. It would be nice to be able to compare different software. (I found it odd, for example, that the red and cyan patches were so large, in terms of the number of pixels, given the non-periodic structure of the branches.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
