Thanks Don. They're scanned negs. I spent about a year shooting almost exclusively with that lens about a dozen years ago. It has a subtlety that I like. The high contrast look came with multi coating techniques.
Paul On Feb 22, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Don Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is my favorite of the set. But I agree it lacks a smidge of > contrast by today's standard. Still it looks pretty balanced. Are these > scanned prints or negs? > > > [email protected] wrote: >> Message: 7 >> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:33:13 -0500 >> From: Paul Stenquist<[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]> >> Subject: PESO - Film Day 2 >> Message-ID:<[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> Cranbrook Manor, an Albert Kahn creation, built in 1908. >> >> Again, the Leica iiif RD and Summicron 2.0. This lens is not as contrasty as >> contemporary glass, and the colors are not as saturated. While I adjust the >> levels, I resist plussing the midrange contrast extensively or increasing >> saturation. It's a fifties film look. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16959353&size=lg > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
