On Feb 24, 2013, at 7:55 , Bipin Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:

> I took out the Leica Film SLR today to give it some exercise and a warm
> sunlight bath. I attached the Tamron 28-200 Adaptal and looked thru the
> viewfinder. It definitely appeared brighter than the K-5s.
> So I put another Tamron 28-200 I have from my MZ-5n days, on the K-5.
> And lo & behold - the Leica's viewfinder WAS Brighter. No question.
> Both use Penta Prisms, and Pentax has always claimed they were the
> FIRST to use Penta Prisms in their SLRs.
> So what's happening here - an ancient Leica and the latest Pentax-Ricoh?

Look at the relative sizes of the focusing screens and realize that while each 
may have the same amount of light "per square centimeter" hitting them, one of 
them has a lot more area - which equals more light.

The smaller-sensor viewfinders CANNOT be as bright as a viewfinder with a 
larger focusing screen.. 

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to