If it is still under warranty hopefully they will just send you a new
one. I know what you mean about not trusting it but I've had a few
cameras go back for repairs and never had any follow up issues. Best yet
if they replace it with a new one under warranty.
Mark
On 3/4/2013 12:10 PM, Don Guthrie wrote:
Thanks Mark. I left it idle w/o batteries for several days but it
actually got worse. Originally it would light up briefly but never
long enough to hit menu. Now with fresh batteries - Nothing.
I am packing it up to ship to AZ today, after collecting the correct
forms and receipts. I have too much invested and it was too much fun
to abandon. But once bit how will I trust it ever again. I was
thinking of investing in that second zoom too.
However the whole experience has me looking at the Oly OM-D. Oh well
tech is so much fun.
[email protected] wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:27:29 -0500
From: Mark C<[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Two small Q Gesos
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I'm sorry to hear that your Q is having problems. I bought my whole Q
setup used and never thought about having to use the warranty -
hopefully that option is available to you. I have heard of cases where
leaving the batteries out for an extended period of time helped resolve
problems, but is likely a long shot.
Good luck and hope you are Q'd up again soon!
Mark
On 2/28/2013 11:55 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
>Mark, thanks for the look and comments. Yes 150mm in a very small
>package. The color has a certain smoothness but I am on kind of a B&W
>kick at the moment.
>
>Unfortunately Q now refuses to turn on regardless of lens or battery
>changes.
>Anybody know where I would send it to be fixed?
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>>Message: 11
>>Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:28:33 -0500
>>From: Mark C<[email protected]>
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: Two small Q Gesos
>>Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>I like the first banana shot (great light on that) and the bike
in the
>>snow. The cafe' (?) shots are good as well and I tend to like the
color
>>ones better for some reason. The 28mm was equivalent to ~150mm on a
>>standard 35mm frame. It seems to have captured a lot of detail in
all
>>the shots. The deep depth of field is apparent in the cafe shots,
but
>>not objectionable to me.
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>On 2/25/2013 11:41 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
>>> >Here are two sets of photos taken over the weekend using the
Pentax Q
>>> >and a Pentax 28mm 2.8 lens via a cheap adapter. Some people
and some
>>> >objects. I tried a 50mm but it was too long to be usable
except for
>>> >bird photos.
>>> >
>>> >Comments welcomed.
>>> >
>>> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632828391581/
>>> >
>>> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632828370481/
>>> >
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
