Quoting Bulent Celasun <[email protected]>:
Maybe slightly off topic but I should warn you all about "fotodiox".
They sold me an adaptor (Hasselblad lens to Contax 645 body) which
was useless.
They said they will replace it.
After some further masseges (me reminding, them lying), they never
did replace.
Another friend from the US (a PN member) shared the same experience.
You have been warned.
That's an unfortunate experience but, just to give another
perspective, I've bought a couple of Fotodiox adapters for my Q and
they work fine. I bought them through Amazon.
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
2013/3/7 David Mann <[email protected]>:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote:
..all you need is a Sony NEX:
http://fotodioxpro.com/index.php/vizelex-rhinocam-for-sony-nex-e-mount-cameras.html
It's ugly and basically it stitches together a series of exposures
to make a single large image. I guess you could do it manually,
but this automates the process.
I bet it's still faster than scanning medium format slides.
I've just reanimated my old slide scanning project this week. The
6x7s are taking about 20-25 minutes each :( Mainly because the
Scanhancer costs a bit of light so I need to crank up the exposure
to compensate, plus I'm using 8x oversampling. So I guess it's
largely my own fault.
I'm only getting the raw data for now, will worry about spotting
dust some other day if I decide to actually do anything with the
files.
Cheers,
Dave
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
