On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Stan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very nice! The blond will probably shoot you if she ever sees it though. > > Imagine what it would have looked like it you had shot it on Tri-X pushed to > 1600. In that context, I think the noise level is quite acceptable. > > stan > Thanks Stan. Yep, on tri-X at 1600 it would have looked like an unexposed frame for the most part. Digital cuts the darkness. Paul > On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> These ladies were in deep shadows with a brightly lit wall behind them. No >> time for exposure comp. The moment would have been gone. Shot at f 2.8, >> 1/50th, ISO 12,800 with the DA* 50-135 at 135 mm. Pushed it 1.25 stops in >> conversion, so it's the equivalent of about ISO 30,000. Noisy, but I like it. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17040012&size=lg >> -- > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
