On 15 March 2013 00:01, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I watched that. I like the design of those cameras. The xpro is kind of > really sexy in a way, BUT I really don't like the xtrans sensor.
What don't you like about it? Its colour? its size? Or is there something technical about it that you don't like? >The k-5 is better in certain ways and better at high iso too. There are also >still problems with lightroom and quite honestly I do not like that fuji >over reports iso by a half stop to make their camera look better in >comparisons. The k-5 IIs comparisons I've seen show that they both resolve >similar levels of detail, but I believe the IIs edges it out and is almost >comparable to the 5dmk2 in terms of resolving power. > > No weather proofing or shake reduction either. Bummer. I know the longer > lenses feature IS, but my k-5 has it with every lens I mount. Fine. If that's important to you, then it's not the camera for you. If you want something that's small, light and takes a wide range of old MF lenses then, in my opinion the X-Pro 1 is a great candidate. >I think I still vastly prefer a dslr ovf to a rangefinder too. Last time I looked it wasn't a rangefinder. Just checked; it still isn't. It's an autofocus mirrorless with a superb optical viewfinder and the option of a pretty good OVF too. >Different strokes. Nice street camera though if they ever get the af to >dslr like speeds. AF speed is fine for me. And anyway, it's still possible to set a hyperfocal distance and shoot happily all day without worrying. That's what I've been Doing with my MF Pentax 28 2.8 and I'm quite happy with it. Cheers, Chris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
