Since you are doing the printing, I'm not going to argue with what you see (at least you actually look at something). I do know the the 2400 dpi files from my HP s20 (~20meg @ 8bit) do not have all the detail that's in the film. 11x14 inkjets from the files, at closer than normal viewing distance, don't appear to be lacking any detail. With 400 print film the grain becomes noticable first (the DSLR files are much cleaner). Most of the pro comments pertain to images used in the print media. I was surprised by the wedding folks, since they do deliver prints. I suspect that if you start with a digital file, and don't have film to compare it to, it looks good and you don't notice anything that might be missing.
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If the final result is for printing at 8x10 or > smaller, or reproduction in a lower-resolution magazine or a newspaper, > digital rocks. If you want to make nice 11x14s or 16x20s that rival > traditional prints with plenty of detail, digital ain't there. Yet. Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� http://movies.yahoo.com/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
