On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:29 AM, larry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Shh. I won't tell them if You won’t. > > Larry in Dallas > > -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Walker > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:47 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K-5 Black & White > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:56 PM, larry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Some editors >> actually consider converting from RAW to JPEG the same as modifications. > > I guess their delicate little brains would simply explode if anyone > pointed out that the camera itself does that when JPEG-shooting is > selected. Oh, goodness gracious me: _Modifications_. How utterly > vexatious of the wicked and devious little thing. > > -- The New York Times, which is known to have the strictest photo modification rules in the business, has no problem with RAW conversions. They do insist that jpegs arrive at the photo editors desk with exif data intact. Paul > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
