Paul Stenquist wrote: >No, didn't notice. But I'd upscale it and print big. It should hold up to >that. Great photo.
100% crop: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/100crop.jpg >On May 5, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>> A mandatory spread in next year's book. Stunning. Also a 20 x 30 print for >>> the living room. >> >> Ah, you figured out it's a stitched pano? ;-) It's stitched from 3 >> shots, though the result as shown come out at only around 5000 x 3000 >> pixels because so much undifferentiated sky has been cropped off the >> top. It's still make a 12 x 20 print at 240ppi, though. >> >>> On May 5, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From a hike in February. We went half way up Mount Washington. >>>> Snowshoes were mandatory - this was pretty tough. As you can see, it >>>> was socked in and there wasn't much of a view. The mountain extends >>>> upward a far beyond what is visible in this shot. >>>> >>>> http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7dd00728-30.htm -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
