On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Collin Brendemuehl <[email protected]> wrote:
> All of the dancing shots were taken with the 18-55. Seems sharper than the > other 18-55s I've tried. > Might just be perception or sample. Or the lens might be diff. Anyone know > about this? I've always read that it's the same formula as the AL II. But I've generally been happy enough with my 18-55's (the original AL and the WR). For example, when I got an A28/2.8, I compared it to the WR, and found the A28 to be sharper in the center, but the WR to be better at the edges, at the same aperture. On my K10D, the 18-55s were sharp enough, under some circumstances, to induce aliasing artifacts like false color and "maze patterns" (the K10D had a weak, one-dimensional antialiasing filter). Some people really seem to think they're dogs, so I don't know if it's sample variation or what. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
