On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to thank Ciprian for his question, without which I would have
> been unaware of UniWB. After a bit of reading (
> http://www.malch.com/nikon/UniWB.html ) I can see why some bother to
> try it,
:) No problem.
A little bit of self-promotion: I've kept a list of all the things
related with digital photography that I've read and I've found
interesting or useful:
http://wiki.volution.ro/CiprianDorinCraciun/Notes/Public/Photography
> however for the way I work I'm afraid it would cause more
> problems than it would solve. I tend to shoot RAW+ and often just use
> the JPEG. (I like to have the RAW available in case I get something
> really good that I want to bring out more in post-processing - or,
> conversely, something is blown in the JPEG that I'd like to recover
> from the RAW). The distortion of the JPEG by the UniWB process would
> be unacceptable to me.
Yes. Unfortunately this is the drawback, the resulting JPEG from
the camera would be pretty useless, as it would get all green and
without any contrast...
> Related? a good article to read, with some good suggestions would be
> this one by Thom Hogan on Magic Camera Settings:
> http://www.bythom.com/magicsettings.htm
Yup. Read it. Loved it.
It pretty much says: don't ask for "magic settings", know your
camera, know what you try to achieve. :)
Ciprian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
