On 6/27/2013 4:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:24:23PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
I had both a panasonic fz-28 and fz-35. I think the v-lux 1 is the
same as an fz-50. They all had great, great optics that more than made
up for the noisy sensors panny was using. When they switched from CCD
to MOS (which gave even worse quality) I quit buying them and bought
my first DSLR. I've made some really nice prints from those cameras.
I have an FZ20, and briefly had an FZ50. When it was stolen, I replaced it
with my K100Ds, because the low light performance just didn't work for me.
The FZ50 had the best user interface of any point and shoot that I've
ever used.
I have to say, if I had to go back to a point-and-shoot for whatever
reason, that'd be the one I get. Hard to believe it's over six years
old. I guess that really doesn't exhibit itself until you get in low light.
But, wow -- what a great daylight camera.
-- Walt
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Walt <[email protected]> wrote:
My pal, Dan, loaned me his Leica V-Lux 1 for a couple of weeks just to kick
the tires on it a bit.
I have to say, for a point and shoot, I'm pretty impressed. The build
quality is no great shakes, and it definitely lacks the responsiveness of a
DSLR.
But, so far, the glass seems really, /really/ nice.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/9152060941/
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/9152060027/
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
