Besides the 28-105 there is also the FA24-90/3.5-4.5 Since I have only the 24-90 I can't compare with the others but general these three lenses (28-70, 28-105 and 24-90) are highly regarded on this list. With the 24-90 you also have a wider lens. I find that I use my Tokina 20-35 a lot less since I have the 24-90, it is a lens I really am very happy with. If the wide range is one you don't use much to begin with, the 28-105 might be a better choice for you, but the 24-90 is the better choice for me to be sure. I don't think, relatively speaking, the extra length from 90 mm to 105 is very big, but perhaps for you that extra reach is important. Try to have the 28-105 and the 24-90 on your camera before you make a decision.
Frits W�thrich Alberto wrote: > I'm planning to change my FA 28-70/4 because I found it a little > too "short" > I've heard that pentax released a new 28-105/3.2-4.5 (I'm not sure of the > apertures) > Can anyone describe its quality ? > I like quality of 28-70 and i would hope not to go worse > Any other option for a pentax user in this focal lenght range ? > > Alberto - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
