On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:44:03AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to > >> list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely > >> because the failure mode is worse with reply-to list (screw up with > >> reply-to sender and you only send something private you meant public). > > > > reply-to-list is preferred when it's... a list! > > Then why have almost all lists switched to reply-to-sender?
I don't see that. The situation I object to is when it is reply to list by address but shows the name of the sender. I have seen much hilarity from that setup. -- Larry Colen [email protected] http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
